“There is no ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This sort of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last viewed.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, Additionally it is a effectively-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
A survey of PACER users, conducted in 2021, measured person satisfaction and determined areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office from the U.S. Courts is using the survey results to evaluate and prioritize upcoming changes to PACER services and attributes.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Individual researchers working on defined research projects intended for scholarly work can utilize the attached form (PDF) to request PACER charge exemptions from multiple courts.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques employed by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion website of technological factors allows for your more detailed legal reaction.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
This guide gives worthwhile insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Section 302 on the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
2. I have heard the realized counsel with the parties as well as learned DPG at duration, perused the record and noticed that:-
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for instance self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could bring about reduced charges or acquittal.
She did note that the boy still needed extensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being safe with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of your actions.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, plus the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release to be a legally identified conviction. Read more
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )